Go Back   Knife Edge > RealFlight - Designer's Corner > RealFlight 7 - Designer's Corner
Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use. | Looking for technical support? Read this!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 02-25-2018, 12:10 AM
DDawg's Avatar
DDawg DDawg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Stockton, CA.
Posts: 732
it's a WIP ... and if I remember correctly, this in not a real plane, it is a fictional design ... so needed extra rivets to hold the panels on ...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ScreenShot1519530716.jpg (177.9 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg ScreenShot1519530953.jpg (158.8 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg ScreenShot1519530965.jpg (171.2 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg ScreenShot1519530670.jpg (128.4 KB, 6 views)
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-25-2018, 02:06 AM
technoid's Avatar
technoid technoid is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,250
Are you saying it's a 'weak' design. Or that I'm so old I can't hold it together
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-25-2018, 10:35 AM
asj5547 asj5547 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 780
Big Red Mk 11 in RF-X, seems to work good for me.

A quick trip through the tress , stables and the town.
https://youtu.be/hT9nbmIqSEQ

Now to test the collision mesh against a speed limit sign, yep, that works fine !!!
https://youtu.be/WDERtmod10M

I am happy you did not increase the wingspan.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Big Red Mark 11 stable door aproach.jpg (262.6 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg Big Red Mark 11 stable door.jpg (146.8 KB, 7 views)

Last edited by asj5547; 02-25-2018 at 12:05 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-25-2018, 11:31 AM
technoid's Avatar
technoid technoid is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by asj5547 View Post
Big Red Mk 11 in RF-X, seems to work good for me.

A quick trip through the tress , stables and the town.
https://youtu.be/hT9nbmIqSEQ

Now to test the collision mesh, yep, that works fine !!!
https://youtu.be/WDERtmod10M

I am happy you did not increase the wingspan.
Cool I still haven't tried it in RF-X, thanks for checking it out.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 02-25-2018, 11:34 AM
technoid's Avatar
technoid technoid is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,250
VOTE:

Should Big Red Mk II stay with the Gas Twin or be changed to the new Nine Cylinder Radial?
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 02-25-2018, 11:53 AM
asj5547 asj5547 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 780
Quote:
Originally Posted by technoid View Post
VOTE:

Should Big Red Mk II stay with the Gas Twin or be changed to the new Nine Cylinder Radial?
Nine Cylinder Radial gets my vote.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 02-25-2018, 12:13 PM
DDawg's Avatar
DDawg DDawg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Stockton, CA.
Posts: 732
Radial belongs under the cowl ... but you knew that


LOL
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 02-25-2018, 12:14 PM
DDawg's Avatar
DDawg DDawg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Stockton, CA.
Posts: 732
Quote:
Originally Posted by technoid View Post
Are you saying it's a 'weak' design. Or that I'm so old I can't hold it together
Now, that right there was funny
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 02-25-2018, 12:17 PM
BrokeDad's Avatar
BrokeDad BrokeDad is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 2,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by technoid View Post
VOTE:

Should Big Red Mk II stay with the Gas Twin or be changed to the new Nine Cylinder Radial?
Can I vote for an even dozen ? .. hehe
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 02-25-2018, 01:06 PM
Ron6234's Avatar
Ron6234 Ron6234 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 336
I like the Nine Cylinder Radial!
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 02-25-2018, 03:29 PM
DDawg's Avatar
DDawg DDawg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Stockton, CA.
Posts: 732
Any better Uncle T?

Still in WIP Stage ... normal map created ... might give it a tad more
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ScreenShot1519586357.jpg (150.3 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg ScreenShot1519586376.jpg (153.6 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg ScreenShot1519586277.jpg (152.2 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg ScreenShot1519586307.jpg (191.4 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg ScreenShot1519586255.jpg (150.7 KB, 9 views)
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 02-25-2018, 04:32 PM
uncle twist's Avatar
uncle twist uncle twist is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,231
Well, first, it was just constructive criticism on my part, not meant to be insulting in any way, that`s not my style, you can certainly do what ever you want. But, to be honest, , I can hardly see the rivets now (except for the stabs, perhaps because they`re closer in the pics.), looks like the bump map drowned them out somewhat, probably because they`re to close to panel line...???? hard to tell by looking at those the pics. the fuse it what I can`t see very well at all (detail wise) How many pixels (I think that the right term, it`s been awhile since I`ve done a bump map.. ) of depth did you use on the the panel lines..???
__________________
Why do today, what you can put off `till tomorrow
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 02-25-2018, 04:39 PM
technoid's Avatar
technoid technoid is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,250
Okay it looks like the radial it is. How about sound for it.

VOTE FOR SOUND PROFILE

Same as the first version of Big Red

Same as the T-28

The built in Moki 180 Radial
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 02-25-2018, 04:57 PM
Ron6234's Avatar
Ron6234 Ron6234 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 336
Same as the T-28 gets my vote
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 02-25-2018, 07:48 PM
DDawg's Avatar
DDawg DDawg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Stockton, CA.
Posts: 732
Quote:
Originally Posted by uncle twist View Post
Well, first, it was just constructive criticism on my part, not meant to be insulting in any way, that`s not my style, you can certainly do what ever you want. But, to be honest, , I can hardly see the rivets now (except for the stabs, perhaps because they`re closer in the pics.), looks like the bump map drowned them out somewhat, probably because they`re to close to panel line...???? hard to tell by looking at those the pics. the fuse it what I can`t see very well at all (detail wise) How many pixels (I think that the right term, it`s been awhile since I`ve done a bump map.. ) of depth did you use on the the panel lines..???
I only went a conservative "2" setting ... I may need to go with about a 3 or 4 setting ... the setting on the Big Red original was a 6 ... I thought that was too much ...

I wasn't mad ... I don't let too much stuff bother me anymore ...

I am still in "WIP" mode ...

I am jumping between this CS and my "new" T-28B CS ... which I wont show yet ... LOL

Let's just say that one is Top Secret for now ...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ScreenShot1519601527.jpg (157.1 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg ScreenShot1519601578.jpg (161.4 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg ScreenShot1519601631.jpg (166.0 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg ScreenShot1519601646.jpg (158.6 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg ScreenShot1519601675.jpg (151.8 KB, 8 views)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:37 AM.