Go Back   Knife Edge > RealFlight - Current Products > RealFlight 8
Use of this site is subject to our Terms of Use. | Looking for technical support? Read this!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-02-2017, 08:59 PM
Ryan Douglas's Avatar
Ryan Douglas Ryan Douglas is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 2,617
RealFlight 8 VR Tips

Here are some things we would like everyone to know about VR. They are grouped into two different sections based on whether they apply specifically to performance or to the overall experience.


VR Experience

Resolution
The current virtual reality headsets provide roughly half as many pixels as a standard widescreen monitor. VR is not about a high resolution presentation. The hardware isn't there yet. Instead, it's about the experience.

Even if the aircraft doesn't look quite as good as it does on your monitor, it's far more immersive to look around the world freely, tracking your model just like you would at the field. VR lets you do things like glance between your model and the runway when lining up for a landing. If you get away from yourself and lose orientation, no longer can you rely on the movement of the camera as a clue; you really need to fly your way out of it. A simulation should feel as close to the real thing as possible. VR adds a new level of realism that has nothing to do with adding pixels.

PhotoFields and VR
PhotoFields do work in VR, but you won’t get the full experience. Because the panorama used to create the PhotoField is monoscopic (2D), the entire simulation has to be rendered that way. This means that you don’t get the 3D effect that lets you judge distance, etc. in VR. This might make the aircraft’s scale seem strange, and it might make it harder to focus on the aircraft against the background.

The 2D panorama also means that you can’t move your head around. Your look direction is tracked, but your position has to be locked.

We know that many users swear by the PhotoFields, so we kept them working in VR. Just bear in mind their limitations.

3D Airports and VR
3D airports (all airports except PhotoFields) allow the full VR experience. In these flying sites, the terrain and all objects are rendered in full stereoscopic 3D. You can even walk around if your physical VR space is big enough. All camera modes are enabled at 3D fields.

Camera Modes and VR
For extra fun, try the different camera modes. Models with cockpits are particularly rewarding. Scaling is applied to cockpit cameras to make the aircraft feel bigger - your head wouldn’t fit inside many model canopies! In general, the cockpit VR experience will feel like flying a full-scale aircraft.

Some users may experience VR-sickness with flying camera modes. This is a hazard with any application that moves the camera around, not just RealFlight.


VR Performance

Framerate is Important!
Maintaining 90 frames per second (FPS) is critical for a good experience in VR. The system automatically locks the framerate to 90 fps. If it can’t sustain that, it drops all the way to 45 fps (and even further to 22.5 if needed). At framerates below 90 fps you can expect to see some doubling of the image and generally have a subpar experience. Therefore, it is important to check your framerate and adjust settings as needed to achieve 90 fps.

Checking Your Framerate
First, make sure you are running version 8.00.019. Then simply turn on the NavGuides gadget within RealFlight and look at the “Graphics Frames/Sec” readout. Note that some airports and aircraft are more demanding than others. You may find your framerate varies depending on what you are doing and where.

Improving Your Framerate
Improve your framerate by adjusting RealFlight’s graphics quality settings. The simplest way to do this is to select Simulation->Graphics… from the main menu and choose a lower setting. For finer control, select Simulation->Settings… from the main menu, navigate to the Graphics->Quality settings group, then tweak individual settings. (Note that changes to some settings do not take effect until the sim is restarted. See each setting’s description for more info.)

You should do whatever it takes to achieve 90 fps in VR, even if it means lowering quality settings beyond what you might otherwise find acceptable for regular sim usage. Some of these settings aren’t very noticeable in VR and won’t be missed. For example, normal maps add a lot of value on a standard monitor, but provide almost no benefit within VR. Turn them off for an easy and painless gain.

“VR Quality” Setting
Within a separate Virtual Reality settings group in the Simulation->Settings dialog you will find a “VR Quality” setting. Its name makes it a tempting target when trying to enhance your VR experience, but use it only as a last resort! Lowering that setting will have more of a negative impact on the visual quality than anything you might change in the Graphics->Quality group.

That is because the VR Quality setting alters the resolution of the entire image being presented to each of your eyes, which is then scaled up or down to match the physical resolution of your headset’s screens. If you lower it, everything is rendered at a smaller size and then stretched to fit (think of it like zooming in), which creates ugly artifacts.

We strongly recommend keeping this setting on High unless you have a compelling reason to change it. On High, visuals are rendered at exactly the right size for the hardware, meaning no scaling occurs.

When Should I Adjust the VR Quality Setting?
  1. Your graphics card is at the very low end of what is supported and struggles to sustain a desirable framerate even after reducing standard graphics quality settings as described above. Lowering this setting just might give you the last little boost you need to experience VR.
  2. Your powerful system easily maintains 90 fps everywhere you fly even with all the graphics quality settings cranked up, and you are looking for ways to further improve the visuals. Increasing this setting will result in supersampling of the entire image for each eye, which can add a small amount of antialiasing. Be sure to verify that you still see 90 fps with it raised.
V-Sync and VR
If you are using VR, make sure Vertical Sync is disabled in RealFlight. This setting is located in the Graphics->Hardware group.


Support

If you need additional help with RealFlight 8, please contact Product Support.

Last edited by Ryan Douglas; 11-03-2017 at 12:39 PM. Reason: Added Support section, clarified V-Sync setting
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-03-2017, 11:31 AM
BaMMeR991 BaMMeR991 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 64
something else that will help is in the debug tool set your pixel override to 1.2 up to 2. depending on your video card. even at one it will put a lot more load on. i have mine set at 1.5......when i go higher i start seeing double images when i do a fast fly-by
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-04-2017, 09:56 PM
bneiderman bneiderman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 12
For VR what should we set the resolution to in the settings under graphic hardware????
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-05-2017, 11:12 PM
brields's Avatar
brields brields is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 952
What is some hardware you would recommend? preferably no more than $200 per unit?
__________________
An A-1D shooting at a P-51 is a bad day for the mustang.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-05-2017, 11:39 PM
csgill75's Avatar
csgill75 csgill75 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Florence, Alabama
Posts: 3,114
Quote:
Originally Posted by brields View Post
What is some hardware you would recommend? preferably no more than $200 per unit?
I honestly don't think there is anything under 399 dollars for VR. Occulus is 399 and is the cheapest on the market. You also have to have a decent Video adapter in the PC.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-06-2017, 04:39 PM
Ryan Douglas's Avatar
Ryan Douglas Ryan Douglas is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 2,617
Quote:
Originally Posted by bneiderman View Post
For VR what should we set the resolution to in the settings under graphic hardware????
In VR mode RealFlight overrides that setting and determines what resolution to use based on other factors. So you can leave it at whatever you like for non-VR use.

If you discover that it does have any kind of an effect while in VR, please let us know! That would be unexpected.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-12-2017, 11:35 AM
Quado Quado is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 4
Using Radeon RX 580 on i5-7400, can't get 90 fps in VR. Get 300- 400 fps on monitor, but drops to 45 in VR/3D Airports.
Simulation->Graphic is set to 'Medium'
View->Scenery set Shadows OFF
1.Should this setup get 90 fps?
2. Are there any guides available like 'Turning Off Normal Maps for Idiots'? If I tried to follow what directions I find via Google, I'd probably make it worse.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-18-2017, 05:53 AM
NigelR NigelR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 35
I am also getting poor performance in VR mode. I get 90 fps in photo airfields, but as soon as I go to 3D airfields it drops to 45fps.

If I check the machine load (in VR 3D Fields) using MSI Afterburner/Riva Tuner, the stats show that the graphics card is running below half load and the CPU is running at about 12%.

Is the VR performance being limited because RF8 is a single core/threaded application?

The machine is a AMD1700x(@3.6GHz)/GTX1080ti/16Gb ram, In RFX the GPU maxes out but again with a low CPU usage, in AccuRC the CPU usage is about 50% (4 cores in use).

Nigel
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-18-2017, 10:22 AM
BaMMeR991 BaMMeR991 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 64
Quote:
Originally Posted by NigelR View Post
I am also getting poor performance in VR mode. I get 90 fps in photo airfields, but as soon as I go to 3D airfields it drops to 45fps.

If I check the machine load (in VR 3D Fields) using MSI Afterburner/Riva Tuner, the stats show that the graphics card is running below half load and the CPU is running at about 12%.

Is the VR performance being limited because RF8 is a single core/threaded application?

The machine is a AMD1700x(@3.6GHz)/GTX1080ti/16Gb ram, In RFX the GPU maxes out but again with a low CPU usage, in AccuRC the CPU usage is about 50% (4 cores in use).

Nigel
thats odd. im not that much different than you and i get 90 no matter what field. i have an I-7 6700 @ 4.5 GHZ and 32 gig of ram and 1080TI. i do overclock my cpu from 4 to 4.5, but for whatever reason if i use afterburner and overclock my video card my framrate drops in RF8 ( VR ) and RF-X
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-18-2017, 08:36 PM
brields's Avatar
brields brields is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 952
Quote:
Originally Posted by csgill75 View Post
I honestly don't think there is anything under 399 dollars for VR. Occulus is 399 and is the cheapest on the market. You also have to have a decent Video adapter in the PC.
Holly H***
__________________
An A-1D shooting at a P-51 is a bad day for the mustang.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-29-2017, 09:49 AM
BrokeDad's Avatar
BrokeDad BrokeDad is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 917
For those looking to tweak an Intel based system give this utility a try. I've been able to increase the performance of mine both CPU and Built in Graphics:

Intel eXtreme Tuning Utility (XTU)

https://downloadcenter.intel.com/dow...ity-Intel-XTU-
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-01-2017, 11:03 PM
Quado Quado is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by NigelR View Post
I am also getting poor performance in VR mode. I get 90 fps in photo airfields, but as soon as I go to 3D airfields it drops to 45fps.

Nigel
Same here. Photo fields get 90 fps. Almost all others get 45 fps. Disappointing.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-02-2017, 05:58 AM
NigelR NigelR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 35
I have now managed to get my Oculus to run at 90fps most of the time, try reducing shadow quality. I still get 45fps with the heli on the ground occasionally , but airborne get 90fps.

Last edited by NigelR; 12-05-2017 at 02:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-05-2017, 02:31 PM
OnTheSnap OnTheSnap is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 13
I've given up getting the Samsung Odyssey to run well with my Asus Zephyrus 1080GTX.

Until there is some optimization, I'm loving 4.0 SuperSampling with Next locked at 90fps with Odyssey. You can comfortably fly away in the distance and maintain orientaiton. But the physics are lacking. RF8 has the edge there.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-05-2017, 04:27 PM
Ryan Douglas's Avatar
Ryan Douglas Ryan Douglas is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 2,617
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quado View Post
Same here. Photo fields get 90 fps. Almost all others get 45 fps. Disappointing.
Quado, you never responded to my post in another thread, so I don't know what kind of system you have or what settings you're using. As I think everyone is aware, VR imposes considerably higher system requirements than non-VR usage. Nevertheless, as I posted here, we have seen quite good performance with hardware that is very reasonably priced. So I am curious about your system specs and quality settings.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:08 PM.